Brexit, Texas, and the American Tradition: Why #Texit is More Than a Meme

Brexit, Texas, and the American Tradition: Why #Texit is More Than a Meme

by Carsten Hood

Texit

British voters’ June decision to withdraw from the European Union in a move popularly known as “Brexit” – a nifty fusion of British and exit – has apparently reinvigorated discussion of Texas secession, particularly in online circles. Prime evidence of this is that in the wake of the UK referendum, the Brexit-inspired (but indisputably better-sounding) hashtag #Texit promptly cruised to the top of Facebook’s trending feed – which it proceeded to dominate for several days.

Wow. Facebook newsfeed supremacy is no small feat, especially for a traditionally right-oriented topic like secession; the social network is known to manipulate its featured content quite, uh, liberally. Considering this bias – along with the Texas secession movement’s relative obscurity and the fierce competition of other trending topics, like Brexit itself – I was surprised by Texit’s apparently massive online treatment.

I have to think that much of it wasn’t very serious. Likely many web-users see Texit as merely goofy, edgy, and a source of dank memes. They still know that, realistically, Texit is implausible; or unwelcome; or illegal.

Or is it? May I suggest that a Texan exit is not only an interesting possibility, but also a legitimate one? Just like Brexit?

“But Brexit is different,” some will say. “The EU is only an international organization. The US is a country.”

Not so fast. The US was also called a Union once; it still is on occasion (consider the name of the State of the Union address, which, interestingly enough, is shared by its EU counterpart). Also, historically the word state has referred to a nation under a single government. Just as the European Union comprises member states – like France, Germany, and the rest – the American Union also consists of annexed states – like Texas.

This shared terminology has a political basis – the same reason that the treaty concluding the American Revolution individually listed each of the thirteen colonies as newly independent entities, and that until after the Civil War the US was typically referred to in the plural (“the United States are,” not “the United States is”). It reflects an original understanding of the states as representing separate, sovereign peoples.

According to the compact theory of the US Constitution, the individual states, having preceded the federal government and having themselves created it, naturally retain the final say in their own fates – including the right to leave. This nature of the American system is epitomized by the Tenth Amendment, which codifies the reservation of state sovereignty.

In sum, however strange this seems today, the US, certainly under the Articles of Confederation but also as conceived under the Constitution, was once perceived the way we perceive the EU now – as a voluntary association of independent states.

Actually, in many ways Europe’s central government is already more powerful than America’s was ever envisioned. The EU not only maintains a court system and military, regulates interstate commerce, collects taxes, and performs other functions familiar to the US Constitution; but it also manages its own central bank and fiat currencycensors unapproved speech, and imposes stifling regulatory burdens, among other interventions.

If it’s unfair to hold the European government to America’s constitutional limits, the American record is even more atrocious. Given the clear-cut case of the United States’ long-drawn centralization of power, it’s not hard to imagine the EU similarly consolidating into its own superstate such that secession becomes as unthinkable as it is today in the US. In fact, for some European officials that has always been the plan.

But Brexit has monkeywrenched the plan. And Americans were paying attention. Even now, long after the post-Brexit hysteria has wound down, mentions of Texit continue to surface online. Some Americans are questioning the sanctity of a system whereby one self-interested city presides over hundreds of millions of people. Is that really so unreasonable?

And yes, I recognize that Texas secession is a far-fetched cause. My aim is not to exaggerate its plausibility; it is merely to suggest its basis in the American tradition. We’ve been propagandized for so long against considering alternatives to rule by our DC overlords. According to the pledge that American schoolchildren recite every day, our country is “one nation,” “indivisible.” But these words – remnants of world war fascism – run contrary to the very founding of this country. After all, our proudest national holiday celebrates an illegal declaration of secession. Americanism is rooted in decentralization.

So the next time you encounter Texit, don’t just dismiss it outright – as foolish, or selfish, or un-American. Because Texit is none of those things. Texit only asks a simple question, to be judged by its answers: Would the Lone Star State be better off on its own?

I think that’s a conversation worth having.

Posted in Texas Matters Tagged with: , , , , ,

Newsletter

* = required field

powered by MailChimp!

Facebook

Austin! Have you been looking for an opportunity to get together with a group to critically examine philosophical texts? Well, here's your chance. We are hosting Socratic Happy Hours to discuss readings that relate to your life.

Join us over drinks and casual discussion over George Orwell's essay, "Politics and the English Language." This essay, dating back to 1946, will likely give some insight into problems we're still facing today.

Sable will be leading us through the essay, socratic seminar style. Participants will join for an hour long discussion where we address open-ended questions based on the text, listen to each others comments and respond thoughtfully, and walk away with a better understanding of the topic at hand as well as connecting more with those who attend.

Is political speech and writing the "defense of the indefensible"? Does it make lies sound truthful and murder respectable? How can we counter what's going on and help strive for sincerity in language? We'll find out together on Wednesday, November 15th at 7:30pm. (Brew and Brew is particularly busy this month, so we shifted our date from the normaly first Thursday meeting). Your first drink will be on us! Please help us spread the word.

*This event is open to anyone interested in having conducive dialogue about the essay at hand and those that agree to come prepared to engage on the text. Please read the text beforehand; there's a link to it in the "discussion" section, and we'll provide hard copies in person.
... See MoreSee Less

Socratic Happy Hour: Politics & the English Language

November 15, 2017, 7:30pm - November 15, 2017, 9:30pm

Austin! Have you been looking for an opportunity to get together with a group to critically examine philosophical texts? Well, here's your chance. We are hosting Socratic Happy Hours to discuss readings that relate to your life. Join us over drinks and casual discussion over George Orwell's essay, "Politics and the English Language." This essay, dating back to 1946, will likely give some insight into problems we're still facing today. Sable will be leading us through the essay, socratic seminar style. Participants will join for an hour long discussion where we address open-ended questions based on the text, listen to each others comments and respond thoughtfully, and walk away with a better understanding of the topic at hand as well as connecting more with those who attend. Is political speech and writing the "defense of the indefensible"? Does it make lies sound truthful and murder respectable? How can we counter what's going on and help strive for sincerity in language? We'll find out together on Wednesday, November 15th at 7:30pm. (Brew and Brew is particularly busy this month, so we shifted our date from the normaly first Thursday meeting). Your first drink will be on us! Please help us spread the word. *This event is open to anyone interested in having conducive dialogue about the essay at hand and those that agree to come prepared to engage on the text. Please read the text beforehand; there's a link to it in the "discussion" section, and we'll provide hard copies in person.

View on Facebook